![]() It does leave out the wider political circumstances that are sometimes equally interesting. The series concentrates on the battles themselves, seen from an individual's point of view. In an attack on the German flank, the heavy French Char-bis attacked individually and piecemeal, while the Panzers circles one French tank at a time in coordinated attacks until they were destroyed or they retreated. What finally won the battle was intelligence, planning, and coordination. ![]() anti-tank gun, which wasn't extensively used. The only truly superior German weapon on the field was the 88 mm. But the Blitzkrieg made ample use of the Mark ii, which was armed only with a pair of small cannon and one light machine gun. ![]() The narration describes the German Mark iii, used extensively in the early and middle years of the war. The German armor wasn't consistently better than either the French heavy tanks or the British Matildas. There is likely to be a tendency among the public to believe that the Germans won France because of advanced technology, but it would be a mistake. A clear exposition of the use of German, French, and British tanks in the Battle of France, using splendid graphics and half a dozen talking heads - both modern experts and surviving participants from both sides.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |